Federal Reserve indicators highlight conflicting signals on cash scarcity, with experts divided over the implications for reserve adequacy in the banking system.
.
A key indicator from the Federal Reserve is gaining significant attention from market participants amid concerns over potential stress in the financial system. This focus has intensified following recent data showing a rise in peak daylight overdrafts—a situation in which banks temporarily withdraw more money than they have in their Federal Reserve accounts to make payments—while the average overdraft levels have declined.
Historically, peak and average levels of daylight overdrafts have moved in the same direction, signaling the availability of liquidity within the banking system. However, recent readings have shown a divergence: while the peak levels rose for the second consecutive quarter, the average levels dropped, hovering near the lower end of the recent range. This unusual split has raised eyebrows in financial circles, as spikes in peak overdrafts often serve as an early indicator of reserve scarcity.
Yet, according to Lou Crandall, a senior economist at Wrightson ICAP, this may not necessarily point to a tightening of liquidity conditions. “It is at least possible that the surge in peak usage of intraday Fed credit will turn out to be a positive,” Crandall noted in a report. However, he also expressed caution, stating, “We’re reluctant to draw strong conclusions from the latest data, as we don’t know exactly what is driving the trend.”
This view was shared by Roberto Perli of the New York Federal Reserve, who spoke at the 10th annual US Treasury Market Conference. Perli indicated that other measures of reserve adequacy still show that bank reserves are within what the Fed considers a comfortable range. Despite the rise in peak overdrafts, Perli suggested that average overdrafts might be a better indicator of stress. “Higher average overdrafts are an indication that reserves are harder to come by in amounts needed to facilitate payments without intraday credit from the Fed,” Perli said.
The Federal Reserve has taken steps to make its liquidity backstops, such as the daylight overdraft program, more accessible to banks. This push aligns with the Fed’s broader efforts to normalize the use of emergency lending tools, such as the discount window, as part of routine operations. Historically, banks have been reluctant to use these mechanisms for fear of signaling financial instability or weakness.
In 2022, the Fed implemented technical adjustments aimed at streamlining the administration of the daylight overdrafts program, though those changes were primarily targeted at smaller institutions. Crandall noted that these adjustments likely did not contribute to the recent surge in overdrafts. Instead, he speculated that some banks might be growing more comfortable with occasional spikes in daylight overdrafts, potentially as part of the Fed’s broader push for liquidity management reform.
Michael Barr, the Federal Reserve’s vice chair for supervision, emphasized the importance of these efforts at the same conference, noting that the central bank is soliciting feedback from banks on how best to improve access to both the discount window and intraday credit.
The broader concern is that if the average level of overdrafts continues to climb, it could signal the kind of reserve shortage seen in 2019, when a surge in government borrowing and corporate tax payments led to liquidity shortages, forcing the Fed to step in and stabilize markets. That episode saw short-term interest rates, including the federal funds rate, spike beyond their target range.
For now, however, Crandall remains cautiously optimistic. “If some banks are in fact more willing to rely on their Fed overdraft privileges to meet intraday working-balance needs, they may be less inclined to hoard reserves going forward,” he wrote. This shift in behavior, if it persists, could have a broader impact on the Fed’s balance sheet strategy, potentially allowing it to shrink more rapidly than expected.
As banks and market participants closely monitor these trends, the Federal Reserve’s next steps will likely play a crucial role in shaping the future of liquidity management across the financial system.
By Orlando J. Gutiérrez